Skip to content

This is the first step towrads building an alternative cloud computing platform. It's supposed to be anti-AWS. This application would be built upon the thesis of considering cloud computing as a utility company akin to an electricity utility co. aims to provide reliable computing capacity at scale at a marginal cost to the consumers.

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

Prajna1999/ccre-be

Repository files navigation

RFC: Cloud Computing Resource Exchange (CCRE)

A Decentralized Marketplace for Cloud Infrastructure
Authors: Prajna Prayas
Date: 27 January 2025


1. Abstract

This document proposes a standardized exchange mechanism for cloud computing resources, drawing parallels to electricity markets while addressing unique computational constraints. The system combines:

  • Commoditized IaaS abstraction layer
  • Continuous double-auction market mechanism
  • Cross-cloud API standardization
  • Risk-managed settlement system

2. Introduction

2.1 Historical Context

"Computing may someday be organized as a public utility" - John McCarthy (1961)
The vision of computing-as-utility has evolved through:

  • Time-sharing systems (1960s)
  • Grid computing (1990s)
  • Cloud computing (2000s)
  • Serverless architectures (2010s)

2.2 Modern Opportunity

Current cloud market inefficiencies:

Issue Current State CCRE Solution
Price Discovery Opaque pricing Transparent markets
Resource Mobility Vendor lock-in Standardized APIs
Utilization Average 40% server utilization Dynamic allocation

3. Architectural Overview

sequenceDiagram
    participant User as Consumer
    participant Exchange as Cloud Exchange
    participant ProviderA as Hetzner
    participant ProviderB as AWS
    
    User->>Exchange: Bid(100 vCPUs, $0.05/hr)
    Exchange->>ProviderA: Price Query
    Exchange->>ProviderB: Price Query
    ProviderA-->>Exchange: Offer $0.06
    ProviderB-->>Exchange: Offer $0.055
    Exchange->>User: Match @ $0.055
    User->>ProviderB: Deploy workload
    ProviderB->>Exchange: Usage telemetry
    Exchange->>User: Bill
    Exchange->>ProviderB: Settle payment
Loading

4. Market Mechanism Design

4.1 Auction Types

Spot Market:

  • Continuous double auction
  • 30-second price intervals
  • Preemption allowed

Forward Market:

  • Day-ahead commitment
  • Financial transmission rights

4.2 Matching Algorithm

flowchart LR
    Order --> MatchingEngine
    MatchingEngine --> |Price-Time Priority| OrderBook
    OrderBook --> |FOK/IOC| TradeExecution
    TradeExecution --> Settlement
Loading

4.3 Pricing Model

Hybrid approach combining:

  • VCG Mechanism (Truthfulness)
  • Mid-Price Spread (Liquidity)
  • ARIMA Forecasting (Price signals)

5. Cross-Cloud Standardization

5.1 API Taxonomy

Layer Standard Example
Authentication OAuth2.0 Unified token
Compute CIMI Lite Instance object
Storage CDMI Lite Bucket interface
Network NaaS 1.0 Virtual router

5.2 Compatibility Matrix

Feature AWS Hetzner GCP
vCPU Unit 1:1 1:0.95 1:1.1
RAM Pricing $0.05/GB $0.04/GB $0.055/GB
Storage SLA 99.99% 99.95% 99.99%

6. Risk Management Framework

6.1 Key Components

  • Margin Calculator: $$Initial Margin = σ(Price) × √(HoldingPeriod) × Quantile(99%)$$
  • Circuit Breakers:
    if price_change > 15% in 5min:
        halt_trading(300sec)
  • SLA Insurance Pool:
    Crowdfunded downtime protection

7. Implementation Roadmap

Phase 1 (Q1-Q2 2024):

  • Core matching engine (Go)
  • Hetzner/AWS adapters
  • Basic spot market

Phase 2 (Q3 2024):

  • FaaS layer standardization
  • Forward market contracts
  • Cross-cloud migration

Phase 3 (2025):

  • AI-powered arbitrage bots
  • Quantum-resistant settlement
  • Edge computing integration

8. Academic Foundations

8.1 Key Papers

  1. Market Design:

    • "The Theory of Auctions" (Milgrom, 1981)
    • "Combinatorial Auctions" (Cramton, 2006)
  2. Cloud Economics:

    • "A Market-Oriented Grid" (Buyya, 2002)
    • "Intercloud Architecture" (Bernstein, 2010)
  3. Risk Management:

    • "Value at Risk" (Jorion, 1996)
    • "HFT Risk Controls" (Aldridge, 2013)

8.2 Historical Precedents

  • California Power Exchange (1998-2001)
  • AWS Spot Market (2009-Present)
  • Alibaba Cloud Spot (2016-Present)

9. Stakeholder Impact Analysis

Group Benefit Risk
Cloud Providers Increased utilization Price competition
Enterprises Cost optimization Operational complexity
Regulators Market transparency Systemic risk
Developers Portable workloads Learning curve

10. Conclusion & Next Steps

This RFC proposes a radical rethinking of cloud infrastructure markets through:

  1. Financial market-inspired trading mechanisms
  2. Strong API standardization efforts
  3. Hybrid centralized/decentralized governance

Immediate Actions:

  1. Form technical steering committee
  2. Develop MVP with Hetzner integration
  3. Establish academic partnerships

Appendices

A. Glossary
B. Reference Implementation
C. Regulatory Considerations
D. Security Audit Plan

About

This is the first step towrads building an alternative cloud computing platform. It's supposed to be anti-AWS. This application would be built upon the thesis of considering cloud computing as a utility company akin to an electricity utility co. aims to provide reliable computing capacity at scale at a marginal cost to the consumers.

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Languages