Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pandoc-crossref filter out of date #13

Open
jsta opened this issue Jan 15, 2016 · 5 comments
Open

pandoc-crossref filter out of date #13

jsta opened this issue Jan 15, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@jsta
Copy link
Member

jsta commented Jan 15, 2016

In my initial attempts at c03fe28 I was using the latest version of pandoc-crossref (0.1.6.3) and getting this error:

pandoc-crossref: Error in $[6][0]: When expecting a product of 3 values, encountered an Array of 2 elements instead pandoc: Error running filter /root/.cabal/bin/pandoc-crossref

Apparently this error gets thrown when the filter is designed for a different version of pandoc-types. I solved the issue by using an earlier version of pandoc-crossref (0.1.5.6). Anyway, I think the filter needs to be updated.

@rougier
Copy link
Member

rougier commented Jan 16, 2016

Thanks. Do you how to fix it ? Can you make a PR ?

@jsta jsta mentioned this issue Feb 1, 2016
6 tasks
@jsta
Copy link
Member Author

jsta commented Feb 10, 2016

I do not know how to fix it. I would have to learn more about pandoc filters.

@pdebuyl
Copy link
Member

pdebuyl commented Feb 11, 2016

Just succeeded using both version. This was with pandoc 1.15.2.1 (from cabal).

@tpoisot
Copy link

tpoisot commented Feb 12, 2016

I think it works if people install the full haskell stack to compile pandoc-crossref. That's a lot of dependencies to compile a paper.

@rougier
Copy link
Member

rougier commented Feb 12, 2016

I did not realize pandoc-crossref would be a problem. Maybe we can revert to simpler solution such as pandoc-fignos, pandoc-tablenos and pandoc-eqnos.

@tpoisot But in any case, only the author (or maybe only the editor) has to compile the paper. For example, in the current submission, I think there might be a misunderstanding since the author provides a makefile to build the PDF while it is not required.

pdebuyl pushed a commit to pdebuyl/ReScience-submission that referenced this issue Feb 26, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants