Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

typos + Aqua CI #138

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 25, 2023
Merged

typos + Aqua CI #138

merged 4 commits into from
Dec 25, 2023

Conversation

ArnoStrouwen
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 13, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (f85fdd2) 94.24% compared to head (4078785) 0.27%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files Patch % Lines
src/reactions.jl 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #138       +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.24%   0.27%   -93.98%     
==========================================
  Files           7       7               
  Lines         365     362        -3     
==========================================
- Hits          344       1      -343     
- Misses         21     361      +340     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@paulflang
Copy link
Member

That's a shocking amount of typos detected by spell check.😅🙈

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

@paulflang can you look into getting tests fixed here? All I did was update the retcode check SciML/SBMLToolkitTestSuite.jl#20 and it's failing. It would be good to keep master passing, even if it's just marking a test as broken. But here, I'm a bit confused on why anything would break: the numbers shouldn't change due to that.

@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas merged commit ea8aae1 into SciML:main Dec 25, 2023
3 of 7 checks passed
@paulflang
Copy link
Member

@ChrisRackauckas this probably has to do with an update in the dependencies. Here is a MWE that reproduces the error:

using DataFrames, ModelingToolkit, OrdinaryDiffEq

@variables t x(t)=1
D = Differential(t)
eqs = [D(x) ~ -x]
@named sys = ODESystem(eqs)
prob = ODEProblem(sys)
sol = solve(prob, Tsit5(), tspan=(0.0, 1.0))
df = DataFrame(sol)  # worked before, doesn't work now
ERROR: MethodError: no method matching SciMLBase.AbstractTimeseriesSolutionRows(::Vector{Any}, ::Vector{Type}, ::Dict{Any, Int64}, ::Vector{Float64}, ::Vector{Vector{Float64}})

Is this known? Do you know if/when it will be fixed?

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

That is not known. @AayushSabharwal did you test the dataframe generation? I can see an SII change in there. https://github.com/SciML/SciMLBase.jl/blob/master/src/tabletraits.jl#L28

@AayushSabharwal
Copy link
Member

Table traits test passes. I'll look into the issue

@AayushSabharwal
Copy link
Member

SciML/SciMLBase.jl#570

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants