We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consider the following code:
IsNot(EqualTo(True)).resolve()
Which produces the following log
... hoping it's not equal to <True>. ... hoping it's equal to <True>. => <True> => not <True>
Sure would be nice if it logged the following:
... hoping it's not equal to <True>. => not <True>
My question is, should this be done by the library by default?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If we think it's OK to do this, it is a simple change to IsNot
IsNot
def resolve(self) -> Matcher[object]: """Produce the Matcher to make the assertion.""" return is_not(Silently(self.resolution).resolve())
Sorry, something went wrong.
Yes, i agree!
No branches or pull requests
Consider the following code:
Which produces the following log
Sure would be nice if it logged the following:
My question is, should this be done by the library by default?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: