You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This feature does not exist in the latest nightly version
I have checked the latest nightly version
Feature Description
It seems the current implementation depends on the insertion order of highlight rules (#1054). This might be unwanted because it's hard to configure exact rules to apply. Two possible designs are
Always apply most strict rule. For example, if a message matches the conditions "from a moderator" (badge) and "from a certain user" (username), the username rule is applied due to its narrower range. It's easy to users and is the desired behavior usually but with limitation e.g. reply is wider than username but reply can be considered more important.
Allow users to decide the priority of each rule. We still need to decide how to handle edge cases such as multiple rules with same priority.
I'm willing to make a patch for this, but I think we should discuss the design before implementation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is there an existing issue for this?
This feature does not exist in the latest nightly version
Feature Description
It seems the current implementation depends on the insertion order of highlight rules (#1054). This might be unwanted because it's hard to configure exact rules to apply. Two possible designs are
I'm willing to make a patch for this, but I think we should discuss the design before implementation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: