We are making a dangerous assumption about the portal's name. It might very well be a portal operating at skynet.mycompany.com in which case the recipient will be rejected.

[mrcnski]

We are making a dangerous assumption about the portal's name. It might very well be a portal operating at skynet.mycompany.com in which case the recipient will be rejected.

I understand that having this in place facilitates development and testing but there are safer ways to achieve that. We should be using the full portal name. We can test by locking onto a specific server by using our /etc/hosts.

Originally posted by @ro-tex in #146 (comment)