Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Track client graphl documents for analytical purposes #21

Open
StarpTech opened this issue May 22, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Track client graphl documents for analytical purposes #21

StarpTech opened this issue May 22, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request idea

Comments

@StarpTech
Copy link
Owner

StarpTech commented May 22, 2021

Describe the problem/challenge you have

As an organization, I'd like to run analyzes on the graphql operations in conjunction with the current schema. This is especially useful when all clients are controlled by the same organization.

  • How does the schema coverage look like of my unified schema across all deployed clients?
  • When can a field be removed from the schema? (Assumes that we know which clients are deployed)
  • Which fragments, directives, mutations, variables are used?
  • Is an operation name used?
  • What's the average query complexity?
  • How many clients/teams consume the api?

Goal: These metrics can be provided without adding runtime complexity to the gateway.

What it can't handle

  • GraphQL documents that are built dynamically.
  • Make statements about schema usage at runtime.

Vote on this request

This is an invitation to the community to vote on issues, to help us prioritize our backlog. Use the "smiley face" up to the right of this comment to vote.

👍 "I would like to see this addressed as soon as possible"
👎 "There are other more important things to focus on right now"

We are also happy to receive and review Pull Requests if you want to help working on this issue.

@StarpTech StarpTech added the enhancement New feature or request label May 22, 2021
@StarpTech StarpTech added the idea label Jul 19, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request idea
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant