We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SBOL uses URI enums in a number of places, e.g., in the draft SBOL3 OWL RDF:
<owl:Class rdf:about="#Orientation"> <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="#SBOLTerm"/> <owl:equivalentClass> <owl:Class> <owl:unionOf rdf:parseType="Collection"> <rdf:Description rdf:about="#inline"/> <rdf:Description rdf:about="#reverseComplement"/> </owl:unionOf> </owl:Class> </owl:equivalentClass> </owl:Class>
How should SBOL factory handle enum declarations like this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Plan: can we handle this by turning these into available constants? e.g., equivalent of sbol3.SBOL_INLINE
sbol3.SBOL_INLINE
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
SBOL uses URI enums in a number of places, e.g., in the draft SBOL3 OWL RDF:
How should SBOL factory handle enum declarations like this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: