diff --git a/report.tex b/report.tex
index e26ae7a..d517828 100644
--- a/report.tex
+++ b/report.tex
@@ -232,20 +232,22 @@ \section{Results}
 \section{Discussion}
 
 The first observation that can be made is that Delta Correlation prefetchers are generally more performant than simply using no prefetcher at all.
-The exception to this is the CPC prefetcher, which is twice as slow as the other Delta Correlation prefetchers tested in the \texttt{ammp} test.
+The exception to this is the CDC prefetcher, which is twice as slow as the other Delta Correlation prefetchers tested in the \texttt{ammp} test.
 Indeed, it is even considerably worse than using no prefetcher at all.
 The reason for this abysmal behavior can be seen in the accuracy statistics for the same test.
-Where the other prefetchers have scored around 0.8 accuracy, which is quite good, CPC has scored less than one hundredth of that.
+Where the other prefetchers have scored around 0.8 accuracy, which is quite good, CDC has scored less than one hundredth of that.
 To have a prefetcher which is vulnerable to extremely poor performance in some secenarios is a bad idea, as it is at best inefficient, and at worst downright dangerous.
-CPC is the only one of the tested prefetchers that have exhibited this kind of behavior.
+CDC is the only one of the tested prefetchers that have exhibited this kind of behavior.
 
-Other than the extreme discrepancy in the CPC \texttt{amms} test, there are not a lot of big differences.
+Other than the extreme discrepancy in the CDC \texttt{amms} test, there are not a lot of big differences.
 Some tests favor one pretching scheme, while other tests favor another.
 Overall, DCPT scores best on average with APCDC a close second.
 Which one should be chosen over the other for use in a given real life application, however, largely depends on the characteristics of the application.
 
 \input{discussion_graph.tex}
 
+\input{graphs.tex}
+
 \section{Conclusion}
 
 \todo{ Mention what could have been done better or different? Future ideas? }
@@ -254,9 +256,8 @@ \section{Conclusion}
 The differences, however, are not uniformly in favor of a single prefetching scheme.
 The benchmarks rather favor different schemes for different tests.
 
-Looking at the average speedup, though, DCPT emerges as the most performant scheme, while CPC is the least performant scheme.
+Looking at the average speedup, though, DCPT emerges as the most performant scheme, while CDC is the least performant scheme.
 
-\input{graphs.tex}
 
 \bibliography{bibliography}
 \bibliographystyle{plain}