-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Instructor's Student Records Page: Misleading name for canceling of comment edit #12665
Comments
Good First Issue - Notes for Contributors Please note that we allow only one We do not assign issues to contributors. If you would like to pick up this issue, do post a comment below to express your interest and check if there is anyone else who is already working on the issue. We will do our best to reply and give you the go-ahead, but if we don't, feel free to submit a PR as long as there is no one else working on it. To get started, do read through our contributing guidelines carefully, and set up a development environment on your local machine before making a PR. If you need any clarifications on our developer guide, or are facing issues that are not found in our troubleshooting guide, please post a message in our discussion forum. |
Can I take this issue |
hi @abdqudus feel free to submit a PR |
Should I just use "discard changes"? The button text is a ternary operator that either reads "Discard" or "Cancel" . I think making the button text "Cancel" wouldn't be that good? |
Oh,Ok |
When editing a comment, the button for cancelation of editing is named "Discard", which is quite misleading - my instinct would be to assume that this deletes the comment entirely, rather than "discarding" the edit:
Possibly a better wording would be Cancel, as is common in other website (e.g. Github):
In a similar vein, pressing "Save" even when no edits have been made to a comment causes the comment to show up as edited - I'm not sure if this behaviour is intended or intuitive. Open to discussion.
The delete icon on the comment might also be better in red?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: