We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
感谢作者的开源 最近看了论文,发现代码中很多细节和论文没有对应,比如: 1:论文选择参考帧有一定策略,但是代码是随机的 2:论文中写明loss由多个组成,如GAN loss、perception loss,但代码中只看到f1 loss 请问这是出于什么原因考虑的,这些对效果影响如何,谢谢!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
开源了之后我们又做了一些优化,论文里是优化后的结果。 L1 loss可以获得已开源版本的效果。 GAN loss和perception loss对于提升清晰度会有帮助。
Sorry, something went wrong.
@aidenyzhang 谢谢,请问后续会有将优化部分代码开源的打算嘛,目前开源的效果,生成的还是有点模糊
请项目团队及时更新开源代码。完成TodoList里面的几个方框的内容。
No branches or pull requests
感谢作者的开源
最近看了论文,发现代码中很多细节和论文没有对应,比如:
1:论文选择参考帧有一定策略,但是代码是随机的
2:论文中写明loss由多个组成,如GAN loss、perception loss,但代码中只看到f1 loss
请问这是出于什么原因考虑的,这些对效果影响如何,谢谢!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: