You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think it would be great if you could choose which order variant groups should be sorted in backoffice.
At the moment the sort order seems to be A-Z .. which might be fine in most cases, but for sizes it would probably be better with a sort order like S, M, L (order of tree nodes - which probably also will be the order you prefer to use on frontend).
I think it will be most flexible to use sort order of the tree nodes as the editors can decide the sort order (but I am not sure if it might conflict with frontend in some cases?)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think it would be great if you could choose which order variant groups should be sorted in backoffice.
At the moment the sort order seems to be
A-Z
.. which might be fine in most cases, but for sizes it would probably be better with a sort order likeS, M, L
(order of tree nodes - which probably also will be the order you prefer to use on frontend).I think it will be most flexible to use sort order of the tree nodes as the editors can decide the sort order (but I am not sure if it might conflict with frontend in some cases?)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: