Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Instead of DF, use a TulipaIO table #909

Open
1 of 4 tasks
Tracked by #701
abelsiqueira opened this issue Oct 28, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
1 of 4 tasks
Tracked by #701

Instead of DF, use a TulipaIO table #909

abelsiqueira opened this issue Oct 28, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
@clizbe @gnawin
Labels
Type: improvement Better way of doing something Zone: code architecture Changes to the structure or fundamentals

Comments

@abelsiqueira
Copy link
Member

abelsiqueira commented Oct 28, 2024 •
edited by clizbe
Loading

Like what is done for dataframes[:flows] in #896, using the strangle pattern.

Storage

  • storage_level_intra_rp
  • storage_level_inter_rp
  • is_charging

Unit Commitment
@abelsiqueira abelsiqueira mentioned this issue Oct 28, 2024
Open
52 tasks
@gnawin
Copy link
Member

gnawin commented Oct 28, 2024

Storage variables are blocked for now, because they need tables for storage constraints.

@clizbe clizbe added Type: improvement Better way of doing something Zone: code architecture Changes to the structure or fundamentals labels Oct 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@clizbe clizbe

@gnawin gnawin

Labels
Type: improvement Better way of doing something Zone: code architecture Changes to the structure or fundamentals
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@abelsiqueira @clizbe @gnawin