-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 41
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
VERB+NNP in proper nouns should be ADJ+NNP #417
Comments
Why do you think VERB is incorrect? (The line between participles and adjectives is very hard to draw in English.) |
From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adjective#Order:
Note that "United" in noun phrases like "United States", "United Kindom", and "United Air" are classified in this treebank as ADJ, not VERB. "Looking" is also ADJ in this treebank. For And if it is a particle, shouldn't it be |
Participle, not particle. I don't think the semantics offers a good test. In UPOS (unlike PTB/XPOS) we don't distinguish names from non-names except nouns within names (PROPN) vs. other nouns (NOUN). The best test I can think of is that "very" can modify some adjectives, but not verbs. You can say people are very united on something. I don't think you can say "the news is very breaking".
I suspect Looking/ADJ is an error. |
I see. So per globalwordnet/english-wordnet#953 you have (for compound nouns annotated with
Where in this case "looking" is an error as you state. |
Hi @rhdunn, I needed help understanding the link to globalwordnet/english-wordnet#953. There, we are discussing the ADJ organization in the English Wordnet, but we still eventually touch on the deeper problem of what should count as ADJ or not in this branch of the Princeton Wordnet. Indeed, we are all aware of the initial motivations, but some can be revised. |
@arademaker The link was regarding the "relates an adjective to a verb" and "relates an adjective to a noun" parts of the different proposed relations. I was speculating on what the EWT tagging rules were based on these adjective classifications. That is specifically regarding the "present" adjectives (based on the present participle form of a verb), where it looks like EWT classifies that as the underlying VERB (with NNP for the PTB XPOS per the noun phrase rules for compound nouns). Likewise, for "resultant" adjectives (based on the past participle form of a verb), it looks like EWT is classifying these as ADJ (with NNP for the PTB XPOS per the noun phrase rules for compound nouns). |
The part in a noun phrase should be an adjective (ADJ+NNP), not a verb (VERB+NNP):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: