Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mains/Alts linking #41

Open
Decypherx opened this issue Jun 22, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Mains/Alts linking #41

Decypherx opened this issue Jun 22, 2020 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Decypherx
Copy link

Hey!

First off, thanks for keeping this addon alive! Last addon standing, that isn't filled with bugs etc! Great work, keep it up :)

Now for the suggestion; We have tons of max lvl alts in the guild. I would love some way of linking alts to their mains. I got no idea how hard it would be to code the addon to read alt names in brackets from officer notes or public notes.

If I link Decyphers as the alt of Decypher, then in the public notes of Decyphers it would read [Decypher] or [Decypher-Ashbringer] and the addon would be able to identify that Decyphers is an alt of Decypher. We're gonna go with account shared DKP pools, alts can bid on stuff in Molten Core and such. :)

If that was to be implemented, it would be the perfect DKP addon (for us at least :) )

Thanks again for all the work in keeping this alive!

@Decypherx Decypherx added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 22, 2020
@github-actions
Copy link

Thank you so much for filing a bug or feature request! You're are helping to make CommunityDKP even better!

@Snizzle12
Copy link

So i noticed this comment and we have the same thing.
Currently we are using Guild Roster Manager addon to actually track which alt belongs to who. Maybe that's a good thing to check out copy/link into CommunityDKP?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants