Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Blocks should affect simulation commands #143

Open
klikevil opened this issue Apr 22, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Blocks should affect simulation commands #143

klikevil opened this issue Apr 22, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request synced Synced to Sprints

Comments

@klikevil
Copy link

klikevil commented Apr 22, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Blocks apparently don't stop the user from using slash commands to kiss at you (haven't tested others) but I used m!ban on a user and they were still able to issue command to make the bot do "kiss"
@klikevil klikevil changed the title Bans--- Bans don't stop slash commands. Apr 22, 2022
@4Kaylum
Copy link
Member

4Kaylum commented Apr 22, 2022

Ban isn't a command, but I assume you're talking about the block command.

Blocking a user via the bot simply auto-declines all commands that make requests, like marry/adopt/etc. The simulation commands aren't affected by this.

@4Kaylum 4Kaylum changed the title Bans don't stop slash commands. Blocks should affect simulation commands Apr 22, 2022
@4Kaylum 4Kaylum added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 22, 2022
@klikevil
Copy link
Author

Ban isn't a command, but I assume you're talking about the block command.

Yes you are correct, thanks,.

@4Kaylum 4Kaylum added the synced Synced to Sprints label Apr 30, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request synced Synced to Sprints
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@4Kaylum @klikevil