GL.iNet GL-MT6000 running OpenWrt with Crusader 0.1 #55
Replies: 5 comments 6 replies
-
@Zoxc @dtaht - any comments on the comparison between the Vendor Firmware (#52) and this report (#55)? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
the gl.inet version is clearly bloated given the slope of the curve. I wonder how much worse it would get if it ran for more than 6 seconds? The bandwidth achieved in openwrt iat 5ghz s only half that of the gl version - is it in he80 mode? thx for running the 25 foot tests. Lot of struggling there sometimes! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Uh oh... There's a typo - I think you mean that the 2.4GHz results DON'T look good |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@richb-hanover I am curious if you can run through this again with the latest? https://forum.openwrt.org/t/mt6000-custom-build-with-luci-and-some-optimization-kernel-6-6-x/185241/1096 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
current build is here: https://github.com/pesa1234/MT6000_cust_build/tree/main/2024.09.29_r27680_6.6.52_next-r4.3.1.mtk/targets/mediatek/filogic I have put this version of crusader on flent-fremont.bufferbloat.net and Dallas.starlink.taht.net so far. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Test conditions:
Firmware: OpenWrt 23.05.4 running on GL.iNet GL-MT6000 router
Crusader Server: 0.1 pre-built for aarch64 running on router
Crusader Client GUI client: 0.1 running on macOS 12.7.5 Macbook
Crusader was installed by downloading the pre-built aarch64...musl...Linux binary
Ethernet
2.4 GHz Wi-Fi - 3 feet (1m) from router
5 GHz Wi-FI - 3 feet (1m) from router
2.4 GHz Wi-Fi - 25 feet (8m) from router
5 GHz Wi-Fi - 25 feet (8m) from router
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions