Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The human player can win by capture way too easily #55

Open
demonoidv opened this issue Mar 10, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

The human player can win by capture way too easily #55

demonoidv opened this issue Mar 10, 2021 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@demonoidv
Copy link
Collaborator

Not sure if this is a real issue as it seems quite difficult to prevent us from being captured other than by turning every half-open two into a half-open three (which is rarely a really good move to play, the AI does it when it feels clearly threatened by the human player and has no better move to play, but it's often only a defensive move and adds almost no value to the potential next move possible).

However, I open this issue anyway in order not to forget there probably is something to do around here.

@demonoidv demonoidv added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 10, 2021
@demonoidv demonoidv changed the title The humain player can win by capture way too easily The human player can win by capture way too easily Mar 10, 2021
@demonoidv
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This is not so true anymore. I'll wait for others to confirm that before closing this issue but it seems to me that we are quite efficient now regarding the defense on captures. The downside of this is that now, the AI is likely to protect one of its 2 aligned threatened by a capture (by making it an alignment of 3) instead of blocking an open 3.

@arlaine4
Copy link
Collaborator

@demonoidv can we close this one ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants