Big delete detection and --monitor
rename detection seem to have failed
#1916
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Renaming a folder does not trigger this catch clause. It is interesting that a rename caused a delete and re-upload, as if the items were in-sync to begin with, initiates the rename API on OneDrive to re-name the folder on-line .... so no re-upload requried. If you can reliably reproduce this, please open a bug report. Additionally - from your other bug report - you are claiming you tested master .... ensure you are running 'master' please - please do not be running any earlier code as it is obsolete and unsupported. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I just renamed a folder with 20GB of files. It got deleted from OneDrive's servers and now the client is slowly uploading them to the new location.
From what I can tell from the documentation, there should have been two mechanisms to catch this.
The first known issue says that
--monitor
should detect such renames and update the remote name instead of deleting and reuploading. I am using--monitor
.The option classify_as_big_delete should have prevented this deletion. I am using the default value of
1000
for this option (well, it's commented in the config file). I am using--monitor
and I did not use--force
.Am I understanding the expected behaviour correctly? Should I open an issue?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions