-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 259
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
EPIC: Re-architecture Temurin SBOM format #3952
Comments
@andrew-m-leonard @sxa I see this got moved to in progress but without an assignee; is there someone leading this that we should assign this issue to? |
That's a good question and one which we hadn't previously explicitly discussed so it makes sense to have clarity on it. We thrashed this around a little in our product owners call today and decided that since there is no explicit work in the epic and the subtasks all have separate owners the epic does not require an owner, but it is reasonably to have it in I've updated our guidelines at the top level adoptium wiki in accordance with this policy. |
Following a review of SBOM -metadata and SBOM.json content it was noted the current sbom.json contains mostly repeated component data for every archive JDK,JRE,DEBUGIMAGE,TESTIMAGE,... which is duplicating a lot of information. The new sbom should refactor the common "runtime/core" component information into a CycloneDX sub-component, referenced by each archive component. |
The Temurin SBOM has grown organically over time with various enhancements. It has got to a point where we need to carefully consider the current and future use cases, and possibly develop an updated architecture/layout of the SBOM
[SXA: Added issues arising from the secure dev call on 30/Sep/2024]
r
andn
characters in component package names #3960The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: