-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 67
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Suggested improvements for IsPullback
#334
Comments
These all seem like great changes! When we do this, we should probably update |
This seems pretty straightforward. Are these changes still wanted? |
I think so. |
Some low-hanging fruit just need people with spare cycles! |
3 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
(from @sergey-goncharov ):
I would suggest:
move the "unique" field to the bottom. It is the most sophisticated property, and must logically be
the last one (this should more generally be taken as a rule for all limits and colimits).
I suggest to replace 'unique' with what is currently derived as 'unique-diagram'. This would make
everything symmetric, and I would expect, in most cases, it would be easier to prove that something is a
pullback.
As a bonus, uniqueness will no longer depend on 'eq : f ∘ h₁ ≈ g ∘ h₂', which is really not needed for
it, but which gets in way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: