Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[EPIC] Source Stripe: Migrate to declarative implementation #51548

Open
lazebnyi opened this issue Jan 14, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

[EPIC] Source Stripe: Migrate to declarative implementation #51548

lazebnyi opened this issue Jan 14, 2025 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@lazebnyi
Copy link
Collaborator

Topic

migration to low-code

Relevant information

Description

This epic aims to transition the Source-Stripe connector to a "manifest only" architecture. The shift will refine how data is managed and synced, prioritizing a cleaner, more efficient, and maintenance-friendly approach.

Background

  • Current Architecture: The Source-Stripe connector handles various types of data transactions and events with a standard incremental and full refresh sync strategy.
  • Issues: The current setup, while robust, can lead to complex maintenance challenges and potential data inconsistencies during incremental syncs.

Objective

To streamline the data handling by shifting to a manifest-only approach, which would rely on predefined data structures (manifests) to manage and sync data, simplifying the overall data processing and reducing the risk of errors.

@lazebnyi lazebnyi self-assigned this Jan 14, 2025
@lazebnyi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

lazebnyi commented Jan 14, 2025

Useful links:

  • this is a PoC to show that we could have another solution than stream selection based on the state) - link
  • Tech spec doc - link

@lazebnyi lazebnyi changed the title [EPIC] Source Stripe : Migrate to declarative implementation [EPIC] Source Stripe: Migrate to declarative implementation Jan 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant