-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 147
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Highlight *S*upported items #62
Comments
@KeyboardInterrupt what do you think? I don't want to abuse what you've built over the years. Maybe something like:
|
I think distinguishing, or rather highlighting, Items, in a way is a good Idea. I have seen other lists do similar things by utilizing Emojis i.E. adding a 🐋 when something runs on docker or 💎 when something is "especially awesome". But I guess adding Text is more clean, inclusive and easily implemented. A compromise would be to have labels like this: With good Alt text for the Images, this approach would also be pretty and somewhat inclusive for People with screenreaders. |
I prefer plain text (maybe bold or italics) instead of emojis or labels. Plain text does not interrupt the text flow and is more accessible. |
Hey, I want to revisit this. After some more pondering, I believe we shouldn't introduce a special label; instead, we could leverage the description text, like so:
This item is already distinctly identified as a resource provided by Red Hat through its description. I think explicitly stating the source in the description might suffice without the need for bold, italic, or any other formatting. If there's no strong objection to this approach, I'd like to close this issue. |
If we do a forum post for #65 I'll add this in as a topic. We recently added some editors into the list, it made me think that highlighting items that are "Ansible Community Maintained" would be useful as readers know that it's more likely these tools won't go away and are worth learning. |
Some items on the list are Supported by Red Hat, should we highlight that?
Other projects are Maintained by Red Hat, should they be highlighted?
I've not looked at enough other lists to see what they do.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: