Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

reactor: refactor the code that does not comply with license requirements #7145

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: 2.x
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

slievrly
Copy link
Member

@slievrly slievrly commented Feb 8, 2025

  • I have registered the PR changes.

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR did

refactor some code

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

https://lists.apache.org/thread/wbq6jsykj2cd9nn91ys1b8r99bfl1h2r

Ⅲ. Why don't you add test cases (unit test/integration test)?

Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 8, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 52.24%. Comparing base (d54c1c4) to head (c0a8768).
Report is 2 commits behind head on 2.x.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                2.x    #7145      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     51.77%   52.24%   +0.46%     
- Complexity     6754     6798      +44     
============================================
  Files          1151     1151              
  Lines         40970    40982      +12     
  Branches       4803     4803              
============================================
+ Hits          21213    21410     +197     
+ Misses        17762    17543     -219     
- Partials       1995     2029      +34     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
.../logback/ExtendedArrowThrowableProxyConverter.java 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 39 files with indirect coverage changes

Copy link
Member

@ptyin ptyin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM


return res;
//Return the final alternative result, or all if result has not changed
return result == null || result === obj ? all : result;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it should be ${res == null || res === obj ? all : res} to convert res to string if necessary.

@slievrly slievrly added the Do Not Merge Do not merge into develop label Feb 10, 2025
@slievrly slievrly removed the Do Not Merge Do not merge into develop label Feb 11, 2025
@slievrly slievrly added this to the 2.4.0 milestone Feb 11, 2025
@slievrly slievrly changed the title reactor: refactor some code reactor: efactor the code that does not comply with license requirements Feb 11, 2025
@slievrly slievrly changed the title reactor: efactor the code that does not comply with license requirements reactor: refactor the code that does not comply with license requirements Feb 11, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Process
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants