You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As mentioned in the announcement thread, if users are intended to start with the higher level module, CodableStructuredHeaders, shouldn't it get the better module name? This increases discoverability (users don't need to know about the other module) and allows users to start at the high level rather than low. The current StructuredHeaders could be renamed to LowLevelStructuredHeaders or anything else that indicates it's lower level than the other module.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As mentioned in the announcement thread, if users are intended to start with the higher level module,
CodableStructuredHeaders
, shouldn't it get the better module name? This increases discoverability (users don't need to know about the other module) and allows users to start at the high level rather than low. The currentStructuredHeaders
could be renamed toLowLevelStructuredHeaders
or anything else that indicates it's lower level than the other module.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: