You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, these ranges (e.g. 2--1) are implemented as wrap-arounds (going right to left) because they are interpreted as 'reverse order' ranges.
It would be nicer if we could support a straight (left to right) expansion of them.
The problem is that the number of fields is not known till actually reading each line, so expand_list() should be lazily delayed till parse time, and on each line which is incompatible with the current implementation.
This is the only case out of 4 which is not 'natural'. the other 3 cases: positive-positive, negative-negative, and negative-positive are all implemented as might be reasonably and optimally expected by the user.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, these ranges (e.g.
2--1
) are implemented as wrap-arounds (going right to left) because they are interpreted as 'reverse order' ranges.It would be nicer if we could support a straight (left to right) expansion of them.
The problem is that the number of fields is not known till actually reading each line, so
expand_list()
should be lazily delayed till parse time, and on each line which is incompatible with the current implementation.This is the only case out of 4 which is not 'natural'. the other 3 cases: positive-positive, negative-negative, and negative-positive are all implemented as might be reasonably and optimally expected by the user.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: