You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for creating and maintaining bedtools: I find the various options that other tools do not offer very helpful.
In running bedtools subtract with the -sorted option and using .bam files for -a and -b, I found that when I did not remove unmapped reads that bedtools would run infinitely. Moreover, after a while the tool would grow its memory usage to around 40 GiB, and I believe this happens when it encounters the unmapped reads towards the end of the file. When I remove these reads from my .bam files, the issue is resolved. I have not tested similar behavior under bedtools intersect or other commands.
I am wondering if it would be possible to have bedtools skip these unmapped reads or at least throw a warning/error about it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
Thank you for creating and maintaining bedtools: I find the various options that other tools do not offer very helpful.
In running
bedtools subtract
with the-sorted
option and using.bam
files for-a
and-b
, I found that when I did not remove unmapped reads that bedtools would run infinitely. Moreover, after a while the tool would grow its memory usage to around 40 GiB, and I believe this happens when it encounters the unmapped reads towards the end of the file. When I remove these reads from my.bam
files, the issue is resolved. I have not tested similar behavior underbedtools intersect
or other commands.I am wondering if it would be possible to have bedtools skip these unmapped reads or at least throw a warning/error about it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: