You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Folks recently requested that parameters like v_sin_i, rotation_rate, and inclination be added to SIMPLE. This got me thinking about...should these be three separate new wide tables? or new parameters in the long ModeledParameters table? Or parameters in a new MeasuredParameters table? How do we decide if something should be in a wide vs long table? I have a sense in my head about how/why we should encourage folks to distinguish between "measured" and "modeled" parameters, but where/how do we draw the lines between those two different types of getting at underlying physical parameters?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yeah, this is tricky. I feel like I have a gut instinct for what's "measured" and what's "modeled," but upon digging into those measurements, a lot seem modeled...
Folks recently requested that parameters like
v_sin_i
,rotation_rate
, andinclination
be added to SIMPLE. This got me thinking about...should these be three separate new wide tables? or new parameters in the longModeledParameters
table? Or parameters in a newMeasuredParameters
table? How do we decide if something should be in a wide vs long table? I have a sense in my head about how/why we should encourage folks to distinguish between "measured" and "modeled" parameters, but where/how do we draw the lines between those two different types of getting at underlying physical parameters?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: