2503 doc autogen w/ commit signature #2570
Conversation
owenwahlgren
requested review from
sukantoraymond,
arturrez and
meaghanfitzgerald
…e-cli into 2503-doc-autogen-fresh
|
added please provide feedback 🙏 there probably needs to be more concrete examples? |
|
@sukantoraymond please review the sdk documentation |
| ## Table of Contents | ||
|
|
||
| - [blockchain](#blockchain) | ||
| - [constants](#constants) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think we need to list every single SDK that we have.
I think we just need to list the main ones:
- Blockchain
- Interchain
- Validator
- Validator Manager
- Interchain
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why don't we want to document the other stuff? I believe we should document everything there is, especially if it's autogenerated. This way the AI we are training on the docs gets more context on all these topics
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Approving and merging this PR so that the updated CLI commands go live on the docs site. We should create a new branch to work on the needed updates for the SDK docs ref:#2570 (comment)
|
Yes, let's get the first version out and then we can iterate on that |
A fresh PR for #2539 as signing commit history and rebasing got annoying