Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

REPL: please add pipeline proposal options: Hack, Elixir #2552

Closed
lightmare opened this issue Jul 7, 2021 · 6 comments
Closed

REPL: please add pipeline proposal options: Hack, Elixir #2552

lightmare opened this issue Jul 7, 2021 · 6 comments

Comments

@lightmare
Copy link
Contributor

Currently it's kinda difficult to test experimental flavours in the REPL.

Alternatively, include the pipeline proposal value in URL. This would probably be even more useful, as besides allowing sending links with pipeline flavour pre-selected, it would also allow me to put an unlisted value in there.

@babel-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @lightmare! We really appreciate you taking the time to report an issue. The collaborators
on this project attempt to help as many people as possible, but we're a limited number of volunteers,
so it's possible this won't be addressed swiftly.

If you need any help, or just have general Babel or JavaScript questions, we have a vibrant Slack
community
that typically always has someone willing to help. You can sign-up here
for an invite.

@JLHwung
Copy link
Contributor

JLHwung commented Jul 7, 2021

You can draft an REPL PR to this repo. Netlify will host a PR website, where you can have REPL attached to the babel standalone built from your Babel PR.

@lightmare
Copy link
Contributor Author

@JLHwung Thank you. Figuring out how to attach it to Babel PR took me a while (at first I only changed version= in the URL, which didn't do anything), but got it working in the end.

@nicolo-ribaudo
Copy link
Member

@lightmare Are you interested in opening an alternative to #2553 that adds Hack and removes Smart (since Hack has been added in 7.15.0) so that we can merge it to the main repl? Otherwise I can do it.

@lightmare
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'll take a look. There are some new conflicts I haven't seen.

@lightmare
Copy link
Contributor Author

New PR #2563

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants