Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ATTENTION: YOUR OPINION MATTERS S! real world ruby/bazel testers are needed #152

Open
kigster opened this issue Nov 28, 2023 · 0 comments
Open
Labels
discussion-needed Needs further design discussion question Further information is requested

Comments

@kigster
Copy link
Contributor

kigster commented Nov 28, 2023

We are trying to decide on which rules should be the primary or canonical rules.

  1. These current rules depend on a very old version of Bazel, fail on CI, but they have been designed with a typical Ruby/rails flow in mind. That's why we have rspec rules and rails example.

  2. The alternative rules by Alex Radionov are much more modern, pass CI across multiple Ruby implementations, provide hermetic build of Ruby, but might be impractical for a large rails application.

I am looking for users of any Ruby rules to play with both and provide some feedback. If Alex's rules become the default, is there anything in this repo that we might want to carry over?

@kigster kigster added discussion-needed Needs further design discussion question Further information is requested labels Nov 28, 2023
@kigster kigster changed the title ATTENTION: real world ruby/bazel testers are needed ATTENTION: YOUR OPINION MATTWRS! real world ruby/bazel testers are needed Nov 28, 2023
@kigster kigster changed the title ATTENTION: YOUR OPINION MATTWRS! real world ruby/bazel testers are needed ATTENTION: YOUR OPINION MATTERS S! real world ruby/bazel testers are needed Nov 28, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discussion-needed Needs further design discussion question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant