We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Newer papers should rank higher?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Reindex with publicationDate as date, so that we can use decay functions (#45).
Sorry, something went wrong.
Adds 'publicationYear' as a separate field (refs bst-mug#74)
ea4e0b9
So that it can be indexed as int/long and then we can use decay functions for ranking as an experiment.
Merge pull request #110 from michelole/master
5b5ba40
Adds 'publicationYear' as a separate field (refs #74)
Forces publicationYear field to be an integer (refs bst-mug#74)
5b36114
Fixes exception when publicationYear is null (refs bst-mug#74)
3704d9c
No branches or pull requests
Newer papers should rank higher?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: