Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question: Why not use something like bower? #12

Open
percebus opened this issue Jan 15, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Question: Why not use something like bower? #12

percebus opened this issue Jan 15, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@percebus
Copy link

I like how gil borrows inspiration from .gitmodules and attempts to do the same w/o maintaining a commit reference. But is a tool, from some guy on the internet. And has not being maintained in 2 years or so...

Yet, every year or so that I revisit the "svn:externals" equivalent, I end up reverting back to adding a bower file that points to git repos #refname (like #main or #v2).

  • Yes, I know this isn't a bug/issue
  • Yes, I know bower is deprecated

I feel like if any of these repo managers would allow for a pull from #main and put it in a relative path of the project, that's probably the better option.

(Apologies, there are no discussions enabled in this project)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant