You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran has got in touch with me to discuss the experimental dataset support and its relation with other (standard) formats and initiatives (W3C DCAT vocabulary, DataCite, RO-crate).
We should initiate this discussion and perhaps bring Arfon into it as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the data for 15977 different repositories, I found
327 instances where the CITATION.cff file included a line that starts with the string type: and has the string dataset in the same line for any version of the file I have on record.
321 instances where the CITATION.cff file included a line that starts with the string type: dataset for any version of the file I have on record.
Other files have no type information, or type information different than dataset, or are not UTF-8 decodable.
So given this simple metric, the ratio of repositories with a dataset-type CFF file at any given time is around .02.
Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran has got in touch with me to discuss the experimental dataset support and its relation with other (standard) formats and initiatives (W3C DCAT vocabulary, DataCite, RO-crate).
We should initiate this discussion and perhaps bring Arfon into it as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: