Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review of draft-ietf-core-conditional-attributes-10 #57

Open
bsilverajan opened this issue Jan 27, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Review of draft-ietf-core-conditional-attributes-10 #57

bsilverajan opened this issue Jan 27, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@bsilverajan
Copy link
Collaborator

From https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/JFK9bJOBiZfP_TNFgcWUMOWOf0c/

Editorial
- that work with
+ compatible with
 
- machine-to-machine communication
+ machine-to-machine (M2M)
(or maybe)
+ Internet of Things (IoT) communication
 
- describe the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)
+ define the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)
 
- 3 CoAP endpoints
+ three CoAP endpoints
 
- query paramets
+ query parameters
 
- parameter can only be supported on resources
+ parameter MUST be supported on resources
 
- error code 4.00 "Bad Request" (or equivalent).
+ error code 4.00 "Bad Request".
 
- the interest of Client B is registered
+ Client B's interest is registered
 
- and creates a new state projection in which the interest of Client B is registered
+ and creates a new state projection registering Client B's interest
 
- an attacker might choose to craft GET requests, in which observations are requested together with conditional attributes
+ an attacker could craft GET requests combining observations with conditional attributes
 
- completeness must not be registered.
+ completeness MUST NOT be registered.
(I am not sure if normative language applies to IANA policies though)
 
- Point squatting should be discouraged
+ Point squatting is to be discouraged

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant