Reduce "14" to "10" where it corresponds to the days of the risk calculation

[DerVogel2020]

Where to find the issue

e.g. https://www.coronawarn.app/de/faq/results/#new_device :
Falls Sie innerhalb der 14 Tage auf COVID-19 getestet wurden, tragen Sie den PCR-Test-QR-Code auf Ihrem neuen Gerät ein. Ist das Testergebnis positiv, sollten Sie das Testergebnis auf beiden Geräten teilen. Für das Teilen eines Testergebnisses auf mehreren Geräten beachten Sie bitte den FAQ Eintrag Wie teile ich ein positives Testergebnis auf mehreren Geräten?.

Nach 14 Tagen enthält Ihr altes Gerät keine relevanten Einträge für die Risiko-Ermittlung mehr. Sie brauchen den Risikostatus auf diesem Gerät dann nicht weiter zu beachten und können die Corona-Warn-App dort entfernen.

Describe the issue

Only 10 days are relevant now.

Suggested change

Change everywhere "14 days" to "10 days" (of course in both languages).

[MikeMcC399]

@DerVogel2020

Thanks for bringing this up!

• https://www.coronawarn.app/en/faq/results/#new_device unfortunately was not changed at all.
• https://www.coronawarn.app/de/faq/results/#new_device was already changed in the first paragraph:

"Damit Sie trotzdem über mögliche Risiko-Begegnungen informiert werden, empfehlen wir Ihnen, den Risikostatus auf dem alten Gerät noch mindestens 14 Tage (10 Tage ab Version 2.20) zu beobachten, nachdem Sie die Corona-Warn-App auf dem neuen Gerät installiert haben."

So I suggest that instead of changing 14 days to 10 days, it needs to list both. To simplify the text, the first mention defines the version differences and thereafter write 14 or 10 days (EN) 14 bzw. 10 Tage (DE) without mentioning the version.

[amouzayanni]

@MikeMcC399

Hello! I'm working with @ahodzic2 and I'd like to resolve this issue if you'd like it done.

[MikeMcC399]

@amouzayanni

@DerVogel2020 has contributed in the past, so might also want to provide a PR. Other than that I suggest waiting for feedback from the Open Source Team. I'm not the one to decide, since I am a community contributor with no official capacity.

[DerVogel2020]

@amouzayanni From my point of view, it seems difficult to determine all relevant code lines. So feel free to provide a PR.

[MikeMcC399]

There is a slight twist to this story if the device is being used internationally. Google stores 14 days, CWA from 2.20 onwards only uses the most recent 10 days of Random IDs stored by Google. I assume that the same is true for iOS.

If a user wishes to use another compatible COVID-19 app, it may be that the app from another country uses more than 10 days, so it could be that the old device needs to be kept for 14 days. This is an edge case, but be careful about the accuracy of any changes made to the article.

[amouzayanni]

Will do! I'll get that pull request ready ASAP.

[amouzayanni]

After reviewing the German FAQ, I no longer feel comfortable making changes to it since I fear the language barrier would prevent me from being accurate. I've finished the English FAQ and I'm ready to make the pull request. Will someone else be able to complete the German FAQ?

[Ein-Tim]

@amouzayanni

For sure.

Will you invite me to access your repo so that I can push the changes there?

You can also get in touch with me via Slack, as @ahodzic2 did.

[amouzayanni]

@Ein-Tim

Just sent the invitation. Thanks for the help! I'd be happy to get in touch, how should I do so?

[Ein-Tim]

@amouzayanni

You can use this invitation link to join our Slack channel: https://join.slack.com/t/covidapps/shared_invite/zt-1704ve9qo-XI_1bKwa2eHle4g44AepHw

[MikeMcC399]

Regarding my comment about considering the case of changing the app during the 14 or 10 days, I went through two scenarios:

• a person goes on vacation to another EU country
• a person moves permanently to another EU country

where the other EU country has their own app and the move happens during this period. I think in both cases that it would be quite unlikely that the user would install a different app on the old phone during these two weeks. So I would ignore this case.

Sorry for making this more complicated than it need have been. I was just trying to make sure we didn't give users incorrect information.

I already made a short comment about this in PR #2691.

[ahodzic2]

I believe with the PR merged this issue can be closed?