-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GL(M)M's as a future target? #31
Comments
It is a potential future feature but I am not close to get there. I have very little time to invest in the development of sommer and my next big step is the addition of the asreml average information algorithm for the n > p (more observations than coefficients) situation. Then maybe 2022 can be a year to work on GLMs but to be honest I am not an expert in the topic of GLMs for mixed models, I've been waiting for someone to contribute in this area but not found yet :) I'll be happy to know if you are or know someone :) cheers. |
I'd like to be, but I'm unfortunately not yet equipped wrt the inner workings of GLMM's. 😆 Anyway, yes I can understand why implementation of AI is taking up the majority of your energy (btw, really looking forward to that when it rolls out!). If I bump into anyone with a good understanding of GLM's, I'll be sure give them a nudge this way. 😏 Thanks! |
Thanks for the suggestion though, for sure I would love to go in that direction. Let me know if you meet someone ;) I will come back to you in the future. Cheers, |
MME- version has been added to sommer through the mmec function. Still doesn't have GLMs but we have moved one step forward. Cheers, |
I was curious if generalised linear models and/or other models that use link functions were a potential future feature.
Given the sommer's rather large scope, I was surprised to not see any mention of GLM's.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: