You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi. I am looking at the 3D equations of motion in the filter, and they are a bit buried in because they are packed together with the discretization, and I have a question about:
I think that this implies that:
v [k+1] = v[k] + a*dt
?
My understanding is that the liner velocity states StateMemberV* are in the body frame, and the linear accelerations perhaps as well (because of the way they are used as control, coming from a twist message).
In this case the equation for dv^b/dt should have extra term related to the rotational velocity, because the body frame is not inertial and dv^b/dt is not really a^b (inertial acceleration expressed in body frame):
Hi. I am looking at the 3D equations of motion in the filter, and they are a bit buried in because they are packed together with the discretization, and I have a question about:
I think that this implies that:
v [k+1] = v[k] + a*dt
?
My understanding is that the liner velocity states StateMemberV* are in the body frame, and the linear accelerations perhaps as well (because of the way they are used as control, coming from a twist message).
In this case the equation for dv^b/dt should have extra term related to the rotational velocity, because the body frame is not inertial and dv^b/dt is not really a^b (inertial acceleration expressed in body frame):
dv^b/dt = - SkewSymmetrixForm[omega^b] v^b + (R^b_e)*a^e
or
dv^b/dt = - SkewSymmetrixForm[omega^b] v^b + a^b
best regards
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: