Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

VerbNet 3.4 may contain 18 sense keys not valid in WordNet 3.1 #32

Open
scalatron opened this issue Jul 21, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

VerbNet 3.4 may contain 18 sense keys not valid in WordNet 3.1 #32

scalatron opened this issue Jul 21, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@scalatron
Copy link
Contributor

The VerbNet 3.4 release appears to contain several references (in the <MEMBER wn="..."> fields) to WordNet sense keys that do not seem to exist in WordNet 3.1. I may be missing something here, though, so someone should verify this if possible. I searched for these sense keys in the offline WordNet database and only found remnants in e.g. sentidx.verb, but not in the actual database or index files. I also searched for some of them in the online WordNet database and came up empty. These keys may have been removed in an update of WordNet.

The VerbNet 3.4 file names and the missing WordNet 3.1 sense keys in question are:

    act-114.xml: engage_in%2:41:06
    amuse-31.1.xml: demolish%2:37:00
    break_down-45.8.xml: fall_apart%2:30:00
    comprehend-87.2.xml: undertand%2:31:02
    distinguish-23.5.xml: distingiush%2:31:00
    dress-41.1.1.xml: bathe%2:29:01, clothe%2:29:00::
    focus-87.1.xml: concentrate%2:31:01
    forbid-64.4.xml: keep%2:41:00, inhibit%2:30:00, restrain%2:37:00
    inquire-37.1.2.xml: ask%2:32:00
    limit-76.xml: restrain%2:30:00
    prosecute-33.2.xml: wn%2:32:01
    stop-55.4.xml: deactive%2:30:00
    transfer_mesg-37.1.1.xml: justify%2:32:02, write%2:32:01
    trifle-105.3.xml: toy%2:52:00
@scalatron
Copy link
Contributor Author

scalatron commented Jul 21, 2020

The disappearance of inhibit%2:30:00, restrain%2:37:00 in forbid-64.4.xml may or may not be related to the issues mentioned in this paper concerning “Anomalies in the WordNet Verb Hierarchy”, by Tom Richens. It revealed a cycle in WordNet for the synset containing those senses.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant