Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarifications wanted for pull 104 #163

Open
6 tasks
sandyhider opened this issue Nov 6, 2024 · 4 comments
Open
6 tasks

Clarifications wanted for pull 104 #163

sandyhider opened this issue Nov 6, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@sandyhider
Copy link

sandyhider commented Nov 6, 2024

Creating a new issue so we do not clutter the 104 pull request.

Checklist of clarifications needed

@kabilar
Copy link
Member

kabilar commented Nov 6, 2024

Hi @sandyhider, thanks for the questions. We will work on incorporating those suggestions.

cc @aaronkanzer

@aaronkanzer aaronkanzer changed the title Clarifications wanted for pull 107 Clarifications wanted for pull 104 Nov 6, 2024
@aaronkanzer
Copy link
Member

Hi @sandyhider -- thanks for the feedback -- incorporating it into the #104 PR right now

One quick question -- where are you seeing the 663980fc2788c46fe81f46b3 in https://663980fc2788c46fe81f46b3--aquamarine-profiterole-e20e84.netlify.app/47_cli_python in the instructions ?

@aaronkanzer
Copy link
Member

aaronkanzer commented Nov 6, 2024

@sandyhider -- just an update here -- I've pushed some changes per your review in this commit: 887bb46

In terms of datalad and git-annex -- @yarikoptic , how would you prefer the docs read here? Simply as a To-do -- wanted to defer to your wisdom since you are an author / power user here

Cc @kabilar

@yarikoptic
Copy link
Member

I guess we could move them (datalad, git-annex) outside of the core infrastructure setup description. Just create a brief section smth like

Service tears around the core infrastructure DANDI archive

In-house

Following services setup around DANDI archive outside (not part of terraform/github CI setups, running on "private" servers) and thus not (yet) described in this document:

3rd party

WDYT?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants