You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It is said in the great annals of the internet that a growth factor of 2 is double-plus bad. The reason for that peculiar peculiarity is the following: let it be said that thou have an array of whose measure is x bultiflores, once its capacity is overarched it will be growed to gx bultiflores capacitated, where g is the so-called, best-in-breed, garowth-factor. After a few such capacity overcaps, let's say y, we end up with g^y x capacity expenditure. Look at the pattern my dear animal:
x, g x, gg x, ggg x, etc.
To be able to reensue past-participled expendited memory we need to have g^y x <= sum(g^z x for z in range(y)) for some y. This is certainly no possible with g=2, as it is a well known fact of the universe that 2^y = (2^(y-1) + 2^(y-2) + ... + 2 + 1)+ 1. Hence it must be said that a different garowth factor must be executabilized.
Whether this shmuck is relevant within the JavaScript runtime ™️ is another question.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It is said in the great annals of the internet that a growth factor of
2
is double-plus bad. The reason for that peculiar peculiarity is the following: let it be said that thou have an array of whose measure isx
bultiflores, once its capacity is overarched it will be growed togx
bultiflores capacitated, whereg
is theso-called
, best-in-breed, garowth-factor. After a few such capacity overcaps, let's sayy
, we end up withg^y x
capacity expenditure. Look at the pattern my dear animal:To be able to reensue past-participled expendited memory we need to have
g^y x <= sum(g^z x for z in range(y))
for somey
. This is certainly no possible withg=2
, as it is a well known fact of the universe that2^y = (2^(y-1) + 2^(y-2) + ... + 2 + 1)+ 1
. Hence it must be said that a different garowth factor must be executabilized.Whether this shmuck is relevant within the JavaScript runtime ™️ is another question.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: