-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 71
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft updated editorial flow for updated Vet Center services #17680
Comments
Note that @omahane has a working proof of concept of a view that recreates a lot of the IEF functionality |
From UX Sync:
|
Pointing this at a 5. I don't think it will take long to document the flows, but want to leave room for collaboration and reviews. |
@thejordanwood As you are reviewing and documenting this particular flow, this is a great opportunity to review help text and identify areas for improvements. I would assume light edits could be done in this ticket but if larger lifts are identified we could discuss how to address as part of Vet Center 2.0 work. |
@omahane @davidmpickett I've mocked this up in the Vet Centers forms Figma file. Can ya'll review to make sure that I'm on the right track? Some notes:
Edit: We can discuss when I'm back on 4/29. Please leave any comments in the ticket or in Figma if you review in the meantime. |
We discussed the flow during UX sync. Notes from that convo:
|
Archiving a VAMC Facility health ServiceDid a little searching. The archiving is straightforward. It changes the moderation state. It's done by an editor on the VAMC Service. That's it. Archiving a Vet Center Facility Service
Removing a Vet Center Facility service
Corresponding Entity ReferenceThis is set for Vet Centers
Creating a service as a node adds it to the facility.
Vet Center editors cannot delete services. They can do the following:
|
Re character counts. Here is an excel doc sorted by character counts on Service Descriptions. The range is incredibly wide 0-5000 with an average of 373. This field is not a good fit for character counts. |
@davidmpickett asked in Figma about prepopulating content from the Vet Center to a newly created service. This can be done with tokens. We currently do it with non-clinical services. Here's the link on the view of content on a top task page:
The Service field on the non-clinical service has a default value that reads in the value passed, using this token This is how the Service itself is populated when clicking on this link: |
@davidmpickett Asked in Figma whether we could have the grey box showing that we have precreated content without the tooltip icon. The answer is yes. As long as you don't populate the "Tooltip Description" field, no icon shows. Here's an example of a test I did locally in a Billing and Insurance top task page: |
@aklausmeier This is ready for your review! The design can be seen in the Vet Center forms Figma. |
@thejordanwood Looks great including the new help text! |
Closing with Amanda's signoff. #18003 is queued for next refinement. Go team! |
User Story or Problem Statement
Vet Center Facility Services are currently added to Vet Centers using the Inline Entity Form (IEF). This creates problems as it circumvents a lot of the basic content moderation logic built into the Drupal CMS. We will need to replace the IEF with either a Entity Browser - Table or a View. There are subtle variations to how those operate in Drupal. One would mean editors edit Services in a modal. Another would mean editors edit Services in a new tab.
AS A Facilities PM/PO or Drupal Engineer
I NEED An overall flow of the proposed new editorial experience for Vet Center editors adding services
SO THAT I can decide on the Drupal implementation path
Design
Vet Center forms Figma
Description or Additional Context
Screenshot of current interface (first screen only)
Acceptance Criteria
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: