Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Regional office content type with new embedded service view #18857

Open
5 tasks
mmiddaugh opened this issue Aug 6, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
5 tasks

Update Regional office content type with new embedded service view #18857

mmiddaugh opened this issue Aug 6, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
Drupal engineering CMS team practice area Needs refining Issue status Regional office CMS managed VBA product owned by the Facilities team sitewide

Comments

@mmiddaugh
Copy link
Contributor

Description

In #17708, the problematic inline entity form (IEF) was removed from the Vet Center node and replaced with a new services view. We can now improve the Regional office editorial experience by adopting this new paradigm

Note additional changes are pending and should be considered for this effort, such as Remove already created services from the options when adding a new service #17674

Tasks

TBD

Acceptance criteria

  • Editors can see the existing Facility Services for their VBA facility while editing the page
  • Editors can see the moderation state of a listed VBA facility service
  • Editors can click out to a facility service to add or edit
  • A token is passed to pre-populate the facility on the service
  • Relevant KB articles are reviewed and updated as needed
@mmiddaugh mmiddaugh added Drupal engineering CMS team practice area Needs refining Issue status Regional office CMS managed VBA product owned by the Facilities team sitewide labels Aug 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Drupal engineering CMS team practice area Needs refining Issue status Regional office CMS managed VBA product owned by the Facilities team sitewide
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants