You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
XA should be the "alphanumeric" regex (-`[0-9a-z]`). XZ can be the "any letter" regex (-`[a-z]`).
** should be removed: E is shorter most of the time, and sometimes one wants to do "fold each on multiplication" (currently $* *, could be $** if ** weren't a token).
@* should potentially be changed, for similar reasons ("get first of each" is currently @ *, could be @*). Maybe @/? With binary @, it's inverting something and using it as an index; with unary @, it's inverting something and getting its first character (or the first element of an inverted list, although that could just as easily be /@). Both seem like they could theoretically be useful in some situation, but I can't think of one.
TBD on removing ++ and -- (in theory, ++ could be useful in a regex expression like XX+ +XD, though I've never had that situation come up).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
XA
should be the "alphanumeric" regex (-`[0-9a-z]`
).XZ
can be the "any letter" regex (-`[a-z]`
).**
should be removed:E
is shorter most of the time, and sometimes one wants to do "fold each on multiplication" (currently$* *
, could be$**
if**
weren't a token).@*
should potentially be changed, for similar reasons ("get first of each" is currently@ *
, could be@*
). Maybe@/
? With binary@
, it's inverting something and using it as an index; with unary@
, it's inverting something and getting its first character (or the first element of an inverted list, although that could just as easily be/@
). Both seem like they could theoretically be useful in some situation, but I can't think of one.++
and--
(in theory,++
could be useful in a regex expression likeXX+ +XD
, though I've never had that situation come up).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: