We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hello. In our project we use LTW in development process. Recently we improved one of the part of our application to use multiple thread to load classes (to speed up application start). But results of parallelizing is far from idea. Threads were mostly blocked by this lock: https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/blob/063d3cc59aad88f02bc82bc6e417a828dae9ef2d/loadtime/src/main/java/org/aspectj/weaver/loadtime/Aj.java#L99 It was added in 2006 in this commit - 397a19d in attempt to fix https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=151182 I wounder if this lock is still required? Or we can drop it to improve LTW performance?. May be it could be replaced with a few different locks instead.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@aclement, can you spare some cycles to take a look?
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Hello.
In our project we use LTW in development process. Recently we improved one of the part of our application to use multiple thread to load classes (to speed up application start). But results of parallelizing is far from idea. Threads were mostly blocked by this lock:
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/blob/063d3cc59aad88f02bc82bc6e417a828dae9ef2d/loadtime/src/main/java/org/aspectj/weaver/loadtime/Aj.java#L99
It was added in 2006 in this commit - 397a19d in attempt to fix https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=151182
I wounder if this lock is still required? Or we can drop it to improve LTW performance?. May be it could be replaced with a few different locks instead.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: