You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the custom Render Example page the rankedTester uses 3 as the rank for the renderer. This woks fine. But I have noticed that the vanilla ArrayRenderer uses 4. So if you take the example Tester Code you can fail when using the same code for arrays. Maybe its better to change the example rank to something like '99' ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Probably we should explain on how to derive on a good number. Taking something very large makes sense if you never expect the tester to be overruled by another one.
I think the ranking concept is clear enough. I was only surprised to see the rank 4 in the vanilla array renderer. Maybe you can do a recommendation to take a rank >=10 as ranks <10 are reserved for the jsonForms core implementation?
In the custom Render Example page the rankedTester uses 3 as the rank for the renderer. This woks fine. But I have noticed that the vanilla ArrayRenderer uses 4. So if you take the example Tester Code you can fail when using the same code for arrays. Maybe its better to change the example rank to something like '99' ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: