You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This might be useful when they have multiple transports connected, say, bluetooth and ethernet/wifi, where the underlying layer has a max-packet size.
This would allow people to use large packet sizes without taking a ram hit on all the other protocols, and should improve data transfer behaviour if messages are sized according to the link's size (full eUI packets in each BLE packet) for example.
This could be done by shifting the interface's buffer to the 'developer scope' and then holding a pointer/length inside the structure. Then macros could be used to instantiate the arrays instead?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This might be useful when they have multiple transports connected, say, bluetooth and ethernet/wifi, where the underlying layer has a max-packet size.
This would allow people to use large packet sizes without taking a ram hit on all the other protocols, and should improve data transfer behaviour if messages are sized according to the link's size (full eUI packets in each BLE packet) for example.
This could be done by shifting the interface's buffer to the 'developer scope' and then holding a pointer/length inside the structure. Then macros could be used to instantiate the arrays instead?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: