You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The attestations tab is a lot of data, and I'm not sure how much of it we care deeply about by default.
I think by default, we could hide the aggregation bits field and the list of keys, and just have a count of the attesters that were signatories of a specific attestation in the summary.
So we have currently:
Attestation 0
Slot: 1234
Committee Index: 1, 2, 3...
Aggregation Bits
0000 1111 0000
Included Validators
abc, badbeef
Could be something like
Attestation 0
Slot: 1234
Committee Index: 1, 2, 3...
Votes Included: 1234
Aggregation bits ^
(click to fold down, could lazy load)
Validators ^
(click to fold down, could lazy load)
This should allow quicker browsing of the rough idea of what's in the blocks - and if people want to know they'd be able to open up that information
If this is too random, i can probably mock up the data - hopefully this makes sense though...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The attestations tab is a lot of data, and I'm not sure how much of it we care deeply about by default.
I think by default, we could hide the aggregation bits field and the list of keys, and just have a count of the attesters that were signatories of a specific attestation in the summary.
So we have currently:
Attestation 0
Slot: 1234
Committee Index: 1, 2, 3...
Aggregation Bits
0000 1111 0000
Included Validators
abc, badbeef
Could be something like
Attestation 0
Slot: 1234
Committee Index: 1, 2, 3...
Votes Included: 1234
Aggregation bits ^
(click to fold down, could lazy load)
Validators ^
(click to fold down, could lazy load)
This should allow quicker browsing of the rough idea of what's in the blocks - and if people want to know they'd be able to open up that information
If this is too random, i can probably mock up the data - hopefully this makes sense though...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: