Replies: 2 comments
-
Currently not possible, be maybe we can add an option like expr.Disable(‘…’) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
I wonder whether we can alias built-in functions by declaring our own
functions by the same name(s). Our functions could be no-ops.
…On Sat, Apr 22, 2023, 5:49 PM Anton Medvedev ***@***.***> wrote:
Currently not possible, be maybe we can add an option like
expr.Disable(‘…’)
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#358 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AACLWE3WSRJTV6SSDWUHK2TXCPEDLANCNFSM6AAAAAAXHXJOHQ>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi,
I am looking at using expr in my new project (A new event streaming engine). So far it looks great!
I'd like to use expr to implement expressions for the language that we expose to the end user. I can see that expr has some built-in functions, but we'd like to have full control over what functions are exposed in the language. Is there any way to disable some of the built-in functions?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions