Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

2025-02-03 Express TC Meeting #328

Open
github-actions bot opened this issue Jan 28, 2025 · 7 comments
Open

2025-02-03 Express TC Meeting #328

github-actions bot opened this issue Jan 28, 2025 · 7 comments
Labels

Comments

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 28, 2025

Date/Time

Timezone Date/Time
America/Los_Angeles Mon 03-Feb-2025 12:00 (12:00 PM)
America/Denver Mon 03-Feb-2025 13:00 (01:00 PM)
America/Chicago Mon 03-Feb-2025 14:00 (02:00 PM)
America/New_York Mon 03-Feb-2025 15:00 (03:00 PM)
Europe/London Mon 03-Feb-2025 20:00 (08:00 PM)
Europe/Amsterdam Mon 03-Feb-2025 21:00 (09:00 PM)
Europe/Moscow Mon 03-Feb-2025 23:00 (11:00 PM)
Asia/Kolkata Tue 04-Feb-2025 01:30 (01:30 AM)
Asia/Shanghai Tue 04-Feb-2025 04:00 (04:00 AM)
Asia/Tokyo Tue 04-Feb-2025 05:00 (05:00 AM)
Australia/Sydney Tue 04-Feb-2025 07:00 (07:00 AM)

Or in your local time:

Agenda

Extracted from tc agenda labelled issues and pull requests from expressjs/discussions prior to the meeting.

Invited

This meeting is open for anyone who wants to attend. Reminder to follow our Code of Conduct.

@expressjs/express-tc
@expressjs/triagers
@expressjs/security-wg

Links

  • Minutes:

Joining the meeting

@bjohansebas
Copy link
Member

Hey @expressjs/express-tc, I’d like to work on the expressjs/generator to support Express 5 and land several PRs in that repository, I know there are people using it, and probably change the name to create-express.

Could you also give me access to the session repository so I can work on version 2? :)

@jonchurch
Copy link
Member

Im working through the agenda and checking on items.

We've got a few that have been carried over for a while now. Is there anything actionable for these items in this meeting? They seem more like discussion items that decision items.

@jonchurch
Copy link
Member

We discussed the dependabot PR, and agreed that Ulises can continue to work on that. He understands the concern of the group, which are noisey dependabot updates, using a caret for our own deps and being a library means that dep updates aren't really useful for us. I noted that we could investigate the security-updates config for dependabot on a weekly cadence, to be able to catch new releases for security patches.

@jonchurch
Copy link
Member

jonchurch commented Feb 3, 2025

From wes v5 minor update (associated issue expressjs/express#6316):

Cookies signature, tj/node-cookie-signature#36, there is a desire from the current maintainer to release the project and have it find a new home. We are okay taking it into the org.

finalhandler, there's some landed but unreleased changes. We are discussing adding engines and revving a v3. We don't have breaking changes in the v2 line, if you consider us supporting v18 for node as of 2.0 (which we documented but without engines). Wes proposes not major revving, leave the engines field PR open. We decided to go with wes' proposal (and we must delete the existing engines field which is wrong, it is set to >= 0.8.

@ctcpip
Copy link
Member

ctcpip commented Feb 3, 2025

@bjohansebas for now, you can simply fork the session repo

@jonchurch
Copy link
Member

ESM Topic. We have an open ADR about this #323

We need to do more async discussion on this, we aren't saying that we'll block ESM but it can read that way.
Blake mentioned that we can call out that CJS is required, but ESM is optional

@jonchurch
Copy link
Member

Generator. Wow this is due for a bigger discussion. We are not sure we want the maintenance burden in the team. So there's a door open for folks around the project/ecosystem to work together to make something (which sounds like fun)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants